From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A517C433DF for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E42B206DF for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="j0BlwJ+u" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4E42B206DF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A928955F; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TUWHKBsjKZre; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0F989510; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFE4C0893; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942C6C016F for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF1F2156F for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4K6AhkV231jm for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ej1-f65.google.com (mail-ej1-f65.google.com [209.85.218.65]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0065A207A4 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f65.google.com with SMTP id dr13so49254182ejc.3 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:12:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kdsNHpxkoZR0fNVD9KrCnenPHEfoVj8EUtIv2TOWsWM=; b=j0BlwJ+uXyhLTpoVaN9qRQHNt/ExEKP8IoksaMZqa2G/4XGDzEBG5CZ1XP1Hg7T47g UD3XFVWzblYT5t/ms/jZ/kOSQDXI062J4zcoI12zRT7aKk05gmg3mBK/5uwnG4gOmOY+ JQ1UGkqzSM9SWpLf/7bMNZL0JSG2St4X/qH93fSqqcwVUBhXtKiHJnGZ76C775HY3BKP ExyyJaWhSRs3DVhVUlCRJOXBM4ACpFKinoaruMVhQcrWFHvuHiXDEsLtWEOrd3087JhD kQQphm2hwLoHiTGTDO85/ZMqrHirIr8UGk6TnfJLnAZEr7oPnJJXSQkIzcmYgFyGv879 eomA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kdsNHpxkoZR0fNVD9KrCnenPHEfoVj8EUtIv2TOWsWM=; b=s8LJmkdKazMLIyVqECbxb8y2atjMm6PIOdxRoi7Bi9tjqUmEtzUey759G+N3xBKtTX xkKpj2kzgPPAFCYNabUrNW9scOtyZAvY0Ct8RiQaPx6zurail5XHEYSfEwx1lxnf0254 vU68vKMlMDnnRL1FUZ7S+2d0jJTARODDHHQ5R1z8ruXOUHL8VxIlypDuYL3qnbE5+cWM vfGc9jx2GFDnXcrXlaDFk+BMAXoinoYfyrEl8o4FcvzmTzvmkwpJwPfb9wpBS8Cdbz4D YjwJGQfv00N6MB8YWxxZTaE5qLxLF/SKiMdFd9+QMbU7DMAeTqu00SSwF/aDILRkZ4ON Xwxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/4N7ejHIcakOrOXcbOPZfklv4CvDWXLxOjhTV/AsVv0Kf72l6 EcNiSZ7nCS7b+sc/mu7ANEIhw6v3II1e7Q4OYC/jxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTblcoIWxEvyJM9MnbL5UwKKNnULlprxGqQYwvDI3+GFPGWhnQgZuUdY2+rUS7JmbetQhGNgiTigGaAcnTS+0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6d56:: with SMTP id a22mr52231269ejt.440.1594192335322; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:12:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <159389297140.2210796.13590142254668787525.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200707065612.8239-1-sjpark@amazon.com> In-Reply-To: <20200707065612.8239-1-sjpark@amazon.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 00:12:03 -0700 Message-ID: To: SeongJae Park Cc: ksummit , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Chris Mason Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:56 PM SeongJae Park wrote: > > Hello, > > On Sat, 04 Jul 2020 13:02:51 -0700 Dan Williams wrote: > > > Recent events have prompted a Linux position statement on inclusive > > terminology. Given that Linux maintains a coding-style and its own > > idiomatic set of terminology here is a proposal to answer the call to > > replace non-inclusive terminology. > > I'm glad to see this patch. > > > > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > > Cc: Kees Cook > > Signed-off-by: Chris Mason > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > > Acked-by: SeongJae Park > > > --- > > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 12 ++++ > > Documentation/process/inclusive-terminology.rst | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Documentation/process/index.rst | 1 > > 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/process/inclusive-terminology.rst > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst > > index 2657a55c6f12..4b15ab671089 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst > > @@ -319,6 +319,18 @@ If you are afraid to mix up your local variable names, you have another > > problem, which is called the function-growth-hormone-imbalance syndrome. > > See chapter 6 (Functions). > > > > +For symbol names, avoid introducing new usage of the words 'slave' and > > +'blacklist'. Recommended replacements for 'slave' are: 'secondary', > > +'subordinate', 'replica', 'responder', 'follower', 'proxy', or > > +'performer'. Recommended replacements for blacklist are: 'blocklist' or > > +'denylist'. > > I have submitted a couple of patches for automated encouragement of the the > inclusive terms and those merged in the -next tree[1,2] now. Nonetheless, the > version says only "please consider using 'denylist' and 'allowlist' instead of > 'blacklist' and 'whitelist'" for now. I think we could add more terms in there > based on this discussion. I could do that after this patch is merged, or you > could do that yourself in the next spin of this patch. Please do whatever you > feel comfort. > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=7d0bea01dec27195d95d929c1ee49a4a74dd6671 > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=95a94258ceb27052f00b7e51588a128d20bf05ed > Thank you for stepping up to take this on, much appreciated. I think I'll leave it to you to fixup checkpatch after the final version of this patch is merged. It may be as simple as "See section 4 'Naming' in coding-style for suggested replacements". _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss