From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D39C486 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E18BDA5 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id m101so87192597ioi.2 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:47:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <87inw1skws.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <1469094899.120686.101.camel@infradead.org> From: Paul Turner Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:47:17 -0700 Message-ID: To: Jiri Kosina Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113df6ac42606f05382b6e02 Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] [TECH TOPIC] Support (or move towards to) LLVM List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --001a113df6ac42606f05382b6e02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 We're considering trying to move our builds to Clang. It's definitely something we'd be interested in talking about, and depending on how the initial attempts go we may have some anecdotal/early data. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > Apart from resolutely not wanting to implement variable length arrays on > > the stack, the LLVM folks actually seem quite keen to make things work. > > I'm interested in the problem you report above.. and note the absence of > > a bug number. Can you provide it? > > I am currently on vacation and on super-lousy internet connection, so > looking through my archives is a bit complicated ... I *think* it started > in "[PATCH] usbhid: Fix lockdep unannotated irqs-off warning" thread on > lkml. > > In case you're not able to find it from there, I'll do my homework > mid-next week when I am back properly online. > > Thanks, > > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs > > _______________________________________________ > Ksummit-discuss mailing list > Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss > --001a113df6ac42606f05382b6e02 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We're considering trying to move our builds to Clang.= =C2=A0 It's definitely something we'd be interested in talking abou= t, and depending on how the initial attempts go we may have some anecdotal/= early data.

= On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Ju= l 2016, David Woodhouse wrote:

> Apart from resolutely not wanting to implement variable length arrays = on
> the stack, the LLVM folks actually seem quite keen to make things work= .
> I'm interested in the problem you report above.. and note the abse= nce of
> a bug number. Can you provide it?

I am currently on vacation and on super-lousy internet connection, s= o
looking through my archives is a bit complicated ... I *think* it started in "[PATCH] usbhid: Fix lockdep unannotated irqs-off warning" thr= ead on
lkml.

In case you're not able to find it from there, I'll do my homework<= br> mid-next week when I am back properly online.

Thanks,

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

____________________________= ___________________
Ksummit-discuss mailing list
Ksummit-discus= s@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/= mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss

--001a113df6ac42606f05382b6e02--