From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22BAF49B for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A404D3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b80so56092808wme.1 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:11:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161027200929.GB17657@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20161027200929.GB17657@htj.duckdns.org> From: Paul Turner Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:11:10 -0700 Message-ID: To: Tejun Heo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [LAST-MINUTE TOPIC] cgroup API List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I hadn't planned on attending since I've been completely slammed with internal stuff this year. But if this is happening I can probably make a last minute booking. On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > (cc'ing Johannes) > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:29:01AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Would it make sense to have a session to try to resolve the current >> cgroup v2 API disagreement? >> >> In the interest of brevity, I'm not going to rehash the issues here, >> but in extremely short summary, they include tasks in non-leaf cgroups >> as well as whether threads in the same process can be in different >> cgroups. > > Yeah, sure. Do we have some time on Mon evening? I'm not sure I'll > be around Tue evening. > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun > _______________________________________________ > Ksummit-discuss mailing list > Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss