From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2463995 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7372027B for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id at1so6925669iec.16 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:08:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20140819163621.GA15109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:38:37 +0530 Message-ID: From: Amit Kucheria To: Shuah Khan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Fwd: Rough notes from testing unconference List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > Shuah Khan: > > - Work on putting a basic framework for tests: Pass, Fail, Skip to start with. > - update existing tests in tools/testing/selftests to use the > framework to serve as an > example for future tests. As we discussed and decided on output will > continue to go to > stdio. This will help these tests being used in other scripts that > run tests in cross > environments. > - Define profiles for short and longer time tests > - Add install target in addition to the existing kselftest target at > the top level Makefile > > I will maintain the test framework - will take care of the logistics > of MAINTAINER > file updates for this and creating a git tree. Individual test > maintainers (we have > several in MAINTAINERS file) will continue to own and maintain their tests. > > Fixes to known cross-build failures and new tests are welcome. Please > send patches to linux-api mailing list > Hi Shuah, At the Linaro power management working group, we've created a simple repository of pass/fail *functional* tests for various areas of interest in power management - cpuidle, cpufreq, hotplug. We call it PM-QA[1] Some of our members have found PM-QA useful to exercise the various sysfs interfaces and get rid of the obvious issues (missing Kconfig options, basic exercising of cpufreq drivers being a couple of examples). Let me know if these are useful and in the right format to seed your library of testcases. Regards, Amit [1] https://git.linaro.org/power/pm-qa.git