From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE5E48E for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f45.google.com (mail-qg0-f45.google.com [209.85.192.45]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 999481FA9C for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id z60so6565431qgd.32 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 07:22:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140511083729.211e9b5f@lwn.net> References: <20140511030009.GO12708@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140511083729.211e9b5f@lwn.net> Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 07:22:36 -0700 Message-ID: From: Olof Johansson To: Jonathan Corbet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Rob Herring , Jason Cooper , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Linux ARM Kernel Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] ARM legacy board DT conversion finalization List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Sat, 10 May 2014 23:00:09 -0400 > Jason Cooper wrote: > >> So, I'm proposing a session where each sub-arch gives a brief run-down >> of the status of the legacy board conversion, and wraps up with a todo >> list. After all of the sub-arches have given their status (5 - 10 >> minutes each?), we hash out helping each other with the final pieces. > > This *really* looks like an ARM minisummit topic to me; Agreed. > hopefully one of those is in the works? Not this year. Last year we had a two-day workshop, and most of it ended up centered around DT. This year, that topic has overlap with other architectures so it's likely better handled as shared technical track topic. There doesn't seem to be a whole lot of topics needing to be covered, at least not based on the call for proposals at ELC (see reply from Alexandre). So, we'll take a break this year and come back and organize one next year if there's more material again. I suppose it's a positive sign; things are running relatively smoothly right now so there's less stuff to iron out in person, or at least to iron out together with a roomful of attendees. -Olof