From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1877F6A81 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 19:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vs1-f65.google.com (mail-vs1-f65.google.com [209.85.217.65]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 515397F1 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 19:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vs1-f65.google.com with SMTP id m5so3705096vsk.6 for ; Sun, 07 Oct 2018 12:51:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861851.4088.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> In-Reply-To: <1538861851.4088.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 21:51:02 +0200 Message-ID: To: James Bottomley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:37 PM James Bottomley wrote: > Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in > the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern > that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the > enforcement clauses to give the community time to consider and debate how this > should be handled. > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds