From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F7B1C61 for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f194.google.com (mail-ua0-f194.google.com [209.85.217.194]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D46196 for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f194.google.com with SMTP id y8-v6so7745478ual.5 for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20180514103428.55285a70@bbrezillon> References: <20180502194632.GB18390@sasha-vm> <20180503020550.GP2714@sirena.org.uk> <20180503031000.GC29205@thunk.org> <0276fcda-0385-8f22-dbdb-e063f7ed8bbe@roeck-us.net> <20180503224217.GR2714@sirena.org.uk> <20180503230905.GA98604@atomide.com> <20180509084440.GW13402@sirena.org.uk> <20180510164722.GH8514@sasha-vm> <20180514101237.5df1e0d7@bbrezillon> <20180514103428.55285a70@bbrezillon> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:40:10 +0200 Message-ID: To: Boris Brezillon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "w@1wt.eu" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Boris, On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:29:04 +0200 > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Boris Brezillon >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:00:30 +0200 >> > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Sasha Levin >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 03:44:50PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: >> >> >>On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 04:38:21PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote: >> >> > What's worse is that that commit is tagged for stable, which means >> >> > that (given Greg's schedule) it may find it's way to -stable users >> >> > even before some -next users/bots had a chance to test it out. >> >> >> >> I just noticed a case where a commit was picked up for stable, while a >> >> bot had flagged it as a build regression 18 hours earlier (with a CC to >> >> lkml). >> > >> > Also, this patch has been on a tree that I know is tested by Fengguang's >> > robots for more than a week (and in linux-next for 2 days, which, I >> > agree, is probably not enough), and still, I only received the bug >> > report when the patch reached mainline. Are there tests that are only >> > run on Linus' tree? >> >> Have your received a success report from Fengguang's bot, listing all >> configs tested (the broken one should be included; it is included in the >> configs tested on my branches)? > > Yes I did (see below). > > -->8-- > From: kbuild test robot > To: Boris Brezillon > Subject: [bbrezillon-0day:mtd/fixes] BUILD SUCCESS fc3a9e15b492eef707afd56b7478001fdecfe53f > Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 20:05:52 +0800 > User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 > > tree/branch: https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-0day mtd/fixes > branch HEAD: fc3a9e15b492eef707afd56b7478001fdecfe53f mtd: rawnand: Make sure we wait tWB before polling the STATUS reg > > elapsed time: 49m > > configs tested: 142 But the failed config (m68k/allmodconfig) is not listed? BTW, my last report had: configs tested: 178 Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds