From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 498369C for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f48.google.com (mail-vk0-f48.google.com [209.85.213.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8BB118B for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v6so123242263vkb.2 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:29:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:28:53 -0700 Message-ID: To: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Kees Cook , Jann Horn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] kernel hardening / self-protection / whatever List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Are there useful things to discuss in person about hardening? (I don't want to bikeshed about the name at the kernel summit if we can possibly avoid it.) Plausible sub-topics include: - "USERCOPY" hardening - Virtually mapped stacks (I'm hoping to have that in for x86 before kernel summit...) - Refcount I don't how much of this really needs an in-person meeting, but maybe some if it would benefit.