From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FDD4B9B for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 17:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626D076A for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 17:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9336C20831 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 17:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id y16so20867583wrw.3 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 10:33:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:33:22 -0700 Message-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: ksummit , Dmitry Safonov , Peter Zijlstra , Jeff Dike , Oleg Nesterov , John Stultz , Andrew Lutomirski , Cyrill Gorcunov , Christian Brauner , Adrian Reber , Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:21 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently. > > The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a larger > range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we have > other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various reasons, > e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters with > a completely screwed time base. > > As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a technical > session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains. > I'm definitely interested, but I think there's only a 5% chance or so that I actually end up at LPC.