From: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] More productive uses of enthusiastic new kernel developers (was: Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers)
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 13:54:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKocOOPv1tRz0RoebO52bTJSkHjjKDMTDSLb-mnjyFqp++hFiA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140530165646.GZ25041@thunk.org>
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> Thinking about this some more, what if instead of, or in addition to,
> having newcomers work on cleanup patches, what if we encouraged some
> of them to help to manually backport patches to the stable kernels
> that don't apply automatically?
>
> Currently the stable maintainers will typically send a notification
> subsystem maintainer / mailing lists that a particular patch didn't
> apply and that it's up some subsystem developers to handle resolving
> the patch conflict.
>
> What if those patches were also cc'ed to a separate mailing list which
> was also monitored by patchwork, and newcomers were encouraged to grab
> patches and try to make a determination whether it's really needed,
> and how to handle doing the backport, and once the patch was properly
> backported they could cc the subsystem mailing list asking for
> approval before the patch could get fed into a long-term stable tree?
>
> It does mean more patches to reviews, but I'd much rather review a
> patch going into a long-term stable tree that would otherwise get
> dropped (and thus avoid whiny entitled users and/or embedded engineers
> who think it's the maintainer's job to backport to N different stable
> kernels), rather than review whitespace patches.
>
> If this worked out, I could also imagine encouraging more advanced
> newcomers to look for bug fix patches that didn't have an explicit cc:
> stable@vger.kernel.org, and look to see if they should be backported.
> This would help for certain subsystems that have elected not to
> automatically mark their patches. There are subsystems which don't
> like anyone but their experienced developers to handle doing
> backports, but I suspect there would also be many subsystems that
> would welcome the extra help, especially if it was much more likely to
> result in additional reviewers / subsystem developers.
>
In addition to the above, how about keeping a maintainer and sub-maintainer
wish list of tasks and work they would like to see get done in their areas and
don't have time do it themselves. It could be maintained on kernelnewbies site.
Having something like this will help guide and give direction to people looking
to get started in a new area and/or any area of the kernel.
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 166+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-24 9:53 [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers James Bottomley
2014-05-24 11:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-24 19:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-25 4:56 ` NeilBrown
2014-05-25 4:57 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-26 15:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-30 16:05 ` mark gross
2014-05-30 16:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-06-01 14:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-25 8:59 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-26 12:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-26 12:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-27 17:27 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-27 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-27 22:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-27 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-28 14:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-28 14:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-28 14:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-28 16:39 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-28 16:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-05-28 17:35 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-28 17:44 ` Luck, Tony
2014-05-28 18:38 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-28 21:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-29 9:28 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-29 17:41 ` Greg KH
2014-05-30 2:41 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-30 17:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-30 23:40 ` Greg KH
2014-05-31 16:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-06-01 8:36 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-05-31 23:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-05-29 18:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-28 22:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-28 23:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-05-29 18:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-29 7:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-28 16:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-28 16:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-05-28 16:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-28 16:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-05-28 16:28 ` Josh Triplett
2014-05-28 17:05 ` Jonathan Corbet
2014-05-28 21:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-28 23:31 ` josh
2014-05-28 23:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-29 0:39 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-05-29 0:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-05-29 0:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-05-29 6:13 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-29 18:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-29 23:34 ` Greg KH
2014-05-30 2:23 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-30 4:26 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-30 5:02 ` Greg KH
2014-05-30 5:33 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-30 14:14 ` John W. Linville
2014-05-30 16:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-30 16:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-30 16:56 ` [Ksummit-discuss] More productive uses of enthusiastic new kernel developers (was: Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers) Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-30 19:54 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2014-06-02 12:00 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-30 20:50 ` David Woodhouse
2014-05-31 1:44 ` [Ksummit-discuss] More productive uses of enthusiastic new kernel developers Li Zefan
2014-05-31 1:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-31 2:21 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-31 22:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-31 2:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-31 3:52 ` Greg KH
2014-05-31 4:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-30 23:47 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers Greg KH
2014-05-30 11:17 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-31 21:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-29 10:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-29 18:36 ` Greg KH
2014-05-29 15:32 ` Luck, Tony
2014-05-28 5:37 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-28 10:06 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-28 13:57 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-24 14:24 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-26 12:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-24 15:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-05-24 17:31 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-25 4:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-05-26 12:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-27 18:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-25 4:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-25 8:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-05-25 9:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-27 8:16 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-25 9:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-25 22:29 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-26 15:53 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-27 14:39 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-05-27 20:53 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-27 21:22 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-05-28 0:10 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-05-28 0:30 ` Greg KH
2014-05-28 23:25 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-28 23:32 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-05-28 23:47 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-29 4:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-05-29 5:17 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-29 23:56 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-05-29 23:59 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-28 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-29 0:35 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-05-29 4:36 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-05-29 16:46 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-29 21:57 ` Frank Rowand
2014-05-29 23:12 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-28 1:10 ` NeilBrown
2014-05-28 5:11 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-26 12:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-28 18:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-05-28 20:15 ` josh
2014-05-29 2:15 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-29 3:34 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-30 0:52 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-05-29 8:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-05-30 0:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-05-30 0:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-05-28 18:48 ` [Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers) Paul Walmsley
2014-05-28 19:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-05-28 19:15 ` John W. Linville
2014-05-28 19:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2014-05-30 14:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-30 15:10 ` John W. Linville
2014-05-30 21:10 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-30 21:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-02 2:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-06-02 2:53 ` NeilBrown
2014-06-02 3:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-05-28 19:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-28 20:12 ` josh
2014-05-28 20:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-05-28 23:02 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-05-28 23:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-05-28 23:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-05-29 14:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-29 14:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-05-29 16:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-30 10:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-05-29 15:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-29 18:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-29 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-29 21:03 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-29 23:30 ` Greg KH
2014-05-30 1:12 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-05-30 5:04 ` Greg KH
2014-05-30 5:39 ` James Bottomley
2014-05-30 11:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-30 23:39 ` Greg KH
2014-05-30 10:08 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-30 13:07 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-30 13:41 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-30 15:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-31 1:30 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-30 14:34 ` John W. Linville
2014-05-30 0:55 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-05-30 15:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-30 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-30 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-30 21:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-30 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKocOOPv1tRz0RoebO52bTJSkHjjKDMTDSLb-mnjyFqp++hFiA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox