From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>,
ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Schedule slot suggestion- Generic drivers - core topic
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:51:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKdAkRStxcd1TJ0tdDRRV_M7Y_-_+sdXCJjssuTWEifQM5pteg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161028214431.GB12838@kroah.com>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:38:13PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2016, Greg KH wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:16:59PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> >> > Having some generic device driver load, prior to a specific driver,
>> >> > and issues / maintenance issues that come with the hacks currently in
>> >> > place to support this / re-invent the wheel to support this per
>> >> > subsystem.
>> >>
>> >> We have hacks for this today? What do you mean by this, quirks?
>> >
>> > I have to maintain a device-id list that explicitly enumerates "these
>> > devices can be handled by generic driver, but would better be handled by
>> > specific driver", in the generic driver itself. Which is horrible.
>> >
>> > It'd be nice for the specific driver to be able to claim this property
>> > somehow.
>>
>> Now that most of the environment is ready to handle hotplug, for HID
>> it should be doable: have hid-generic probe devices last and have
>> driver core recognize generic/vs tailored driver (flag?) and if device
>> matches tailored driver forcibly unbind from generic and allow
>> tailored to bind to the device. There will be window of time when
>> device is bound to a "wrong" driver, but because of hotplug who cares.
>
> "forcibly unbind" is the trick here, along with the fact of drivers not
> being asked to match with devices already bound to a driver. It might
> be possible, I'd love to see patches to try it, given that the topic
> comes up every other year or so...
We already allow forcibly unbinding via sysfs, so it should be
possible to do that when loading new driver.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-28 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-28 21:16 Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-10-28 21:21 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-10-28 21:23 ` Greg KH
2016-10-28 21:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-10-28 21:29 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-10-28 21:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-10-28 21:44 ` Greg KH
2016-10-28 21:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2016-10-29 1:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-28 21:43 ` Greg KH
2016-10-31 2:13 ` Rob Herring
2016-10-31 4:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-31 4:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKdAkRStxcd1TJ0tdDRRV_M7Y_-_+sdXCJjssuTWEifQM5pteg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox