From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0FAD33 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8F94102 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q4-v6so3050730iob.8 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:01:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1536592110.4035.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <2620504.doLR7ekjFm@avalon> <878t482zki.fsf@intel.com> From: Daniel Vetter Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:01:44 +0200 Message-ID: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community management/subsystem governance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:44 AM Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > That's also one of my concerns. The differences between subsystems that all >> > use an email-based review process can already be confusing, or just annoying >> > to handle, especially when specific tools are mandated (the DRM dim tool or >> > the ARM patch system come to mind). >> >> Note that you don't need to use dim unless you become a committer or a >> maintainer to a tree that's maintained using dim. > > Which unfortunately cannot be said about the ARM patch system... Is there some docs about this ARM patch systems? Or just a link to what it is? I've never heard of it, until this thread here. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch