From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43632F68 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 19:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f49.google.com (mail-it0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E033C8B for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 19:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j81-v6so17232242ite.0 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 12:48:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1536263073.6012.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <1536263073.6012.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: Daniel Vetter Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:47:59 +0200 Message-ID: To: James Bottomley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER TOPIC] Succession Planning: Is It time to Throw Linus Under a Bus? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:44 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > Since our fearless leader apparently can't even remember the dates of > the only conference he goes to, perhaps now might be a good time to > talk about how we'd run an orderly succession process (purely > theoretically, of course ...) > > I think a vote amongst the Maintainer Summit attendees might be the way > to elect a new leader, but others probably have different ideas. Why I single leader? This group maintainer ship thing ... it works. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch