From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6A2ED4C for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FFD6102 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q4-v6so14085iob.8 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 01:59:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel Vetter Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:59:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: ksummit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community management/subsystem governance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi all, I've read Laura's recent blog post on community management in the linux kernel and want to pick it up: https://www.labbott.name/blog/2018/09/04/kernel-community-management/ I think for pratical reasons (the linux kernel is huge) focusing on subsystems is more useful, at least in the short term. Much easier to experiment with new things in smaller groups. That's why I added "subsystem governance". If there's enough interest on specific topics we could schedule some BOF sessions, otherwise just hallway track with interested parties. Specific topics I'm interested in: - New experiments in group maintainership, and sharing lessons learned in general. - Assuming it gets accepted I think my LPC talk on "migrating to gitlab" will raise some questions, and probably overflow into hallway track or a BOF session. - I've held a somewhat controversially received talk earlier this year. I'm happy to do a Q&A on that, if there's interest. But I'm open to anything else really on the larger topic of community mangement. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch