From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F080D31 for ; Sun, 13 May 2018 13:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f194.google.com (mail-qt0-f194.google.com [209.85.216.194]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4822189 for ; Sun, 13 May 2018 13:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f194.google.com with SMTP id e8-v6so12988592qth.0 for ; Sun, 13 May 2018 06:53:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180512143809.7c6a06ab@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20180502194632.GB18390@sasha-vm> <20180503020550.GP2714@sirena.org.uk> <20180503031000.GC29205@thunk.org> <0276fcda-0385-8f22-dbdb-e063f7ed8bbe@roeck-us.net> <20180503224217.GR2714@sirena.org.uk> <20180503230905.GA98604@atomide.com> <20180509084440.GW13402@sirena.org.uk> <20180509090346.GY13402@sirena.org.uk> <20180509204727.7ff38021@canb.auug.org.au> <20180512143809.7c6a06ab@canb.auug.org.au> From: Andy Shevchenko Message-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "w@1wt.eu" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 13:53:36 -0000 On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, 9 May 2018 20:47:27 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:03:46 +0900 Mark Brown wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Mark Brown wrote: >> > >> > > > I think this is an excellent idea, copying in Stephen for his input. >> > > > I'm currently on holiday but unless someone convinces me it's a terrible >> > > > idea I'm willing to at least give it a go on a trial basis once I'm back >> > > > home. >> > >> > > Since Stephen merges all -fixes branches first, before merging all the >> > > -next branches, he already generates that as part of linux-next. All >> > > he'd need to do is push that intermediate state out to some >> > > linux-fixes branch for consumption by test bots. >> >> Good idea ... I will see what I can do. > > See my announcement of a pending-fixes branch in linux-next (on LKML > and others) > >> I currently have 44 such fixes branches. More welcome! > > We are up to 55. For PDx86 we have git://git.infradead.org/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git fixes branch -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko