From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0985C8DC for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A72180 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5ec3ad68 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 333d55f1 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id k64-v6so1214276oia.13 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 17:12:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 02:12:19 +0200 Message-ID: To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TALK] WireGuard: Next-Generation Secure Kernel Network Tunnel List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Confusingly, this talk was actually accepted for the main refereed track at Plumbers, which probably makes more sense anyway for it. So I should probably retract this submission. However, the more important and relevant talk -- the one on Zinc -- is really quite appropriate for the kernel track and is sure to spur a lot of needed discussion. So please focus attention on that instead. Thanks, Jason