From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com (mail-ed1-f50.google.com [209.85.208.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899D118C30 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 19:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="HNV9krDd" Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-53e70b0a218so5493395a12.2 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:18:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; t=1698088691; x=1698693491; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dz5jjur3qivUWZ6NESJNIBFVtESDaXyAPO0M+awTZ3M=; b=HNV9krDdHroQHtVOot36bLbrJvr4l51IiL+TTznInTaOneyM9k/tAgkblDNv7WhQpq kcRukhTCaiw/WPPokEkQbDP9+tymbjnT4RFC2zvDKPkk0+NDIn9+bo+97U2aKp8vrzLz 5DUhf63NXiUy62tc5g8xDx+i2c0bfLBo8sEDo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698088691; x=1698693491; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=dz5jjur3qivUWZ6NESJNIBFVtESDaXyAPO0M+awTZ3M=; b=FDVsLc14Jd13q2XfSVPZ9rX5uCLZZqeXBFGQ29HMAoj9iB1BwjNNbOU0gLu8DKoiUg +k9uQB4AR3UhGTjsf9VycaaaghmHUjdidrbF67rvCvPNDIPQ4qDXPtyDAgA8Uj781aUg pbJIBBHf7QOkbBOhtIljt1M9Wq/+x+6s7hKQgGdaudSIeCYphgflVg7nmgBUV2jxLVAs dpP1Ac93QKqIVB4fE2ZEdomcHDfzYE6FggJAScf5T/0b3QCbCSw1mCOM1JSL/jc/fnll APY0hceWN2sNzMFRbnLW4qCM+8SBXJt9nkg+19SGESmestb3qWf/g3ZHS5mNT7oCrL7c 9LTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxPvdrDKOSF6EOVlbYoZSKfSuwfNaBLa/L7DIvSwmaUZoFKIQYK P5vRmZbU8fkU+bHm3z53OppG/z48xRVNLuLJZ7ydbKkz X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFBadnaP/8FYzX2m0drBJqSlrXeCAWl/oa3V7Z5yJK9Jp3zOfjzxlGztPWcgxQFQ95LGUlcRA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:9ecb:0:b0:53e:f9ef:ca6b with SMTP id a69-20020a509ecb000000b0053ef9efca6bmr7126434edf.7.1698088691504; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (mail-ed1-f45.google.com. [209.85.208.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dm28-20020a05640222dc00b0053def18ee8bsm6673171edb.20.2023.10.23.12.18.10 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-53e08b60febso5520063a12.1 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:18:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5243:b0:53e:7fe:b856 with SMTP id t3-20020a056402524300b0053e07feb856mr8559456edd.15.1698088690404; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <369bc919-1a1d-4f37-9cc9-742a86a41282@kadam.mountain> <20231023114949.34fc967988c354547f79c4e7@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:17:53 -1000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: KTODO automated TODO lists To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Andrew Morton , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Dan Carpenter , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, outreachy@lists.linux.dev, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 09:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > How to handle the (unfortunately fairly common) case of > reply-with-CC-of-forgotten-relevant-person_added? One option might be to just do a proper non-quoting reply and have a link to lore for context for the originally-forgotten person. I've done that anyway several times, where I reply to something, and bring in new people, and add a lore link for context. I wouldn't have recommended that a few years ago, but lore has been so reliable (and reliably fast - not usually the case for most email archives) that I think it's a great way to fill people in. But yes, it does end up being a "outside email" thing. I suspect we're all good with that these days - the days of people working in text terminals purely out of email are long gone anyway, methinks. Anyway, I'm in no way trying to say this is the way forward, but I do agree with Andrew that we've seen quite a bit of "long messages that are mostly quoting", and it's not great. Linus