From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com>,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] ARM legacy board DT conversion finalization
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 23:41:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA-1d_47g3Z3R=CNyE8U5+huJ0yDvAMU+BRacajxE5qPXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4931877.zNfKfvcgox@wuerfel>
On 19 May 2014 13:20, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Friday 16 May 2014 23:20:42 Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Versatile is one of ARM's own development boards, but more importantly
>> it's something QEMU can emulate.
>
> We should really have this in multiplatform soon, I think the last issue
> for versatile is common clock support, but Linus Walleij may have more
> details about what remains here.
>
> We should also make it possible to enable ARCH_VIRT for pre-ARMv7 to
> get qemu users to move over to that.
I think the main reason many people still use QEMU's versatilepb
model is that it has PCI. If you want people to move off that then
getting those "generic device-tree driven PCI" patches into the
kernel would probably be a good start :-) At that point we can
reasonably easily add PCI support to the QEMU 'virt' board.
thanks
-- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-19 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-11 3:00 Jason Cooper
2014-05-11 12:37 ` Jonathan Corbet
2014-05-11 13:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-05-11 14:22 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-15 12:15 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-15 13:38 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-15 18:50 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-15 19:42 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-16 3:30 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-16 4:10 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-16 18:31 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-05-16 18:42 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-16 22:20 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-05-19 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-19 22:41 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2014-05-19 23:06 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-20 8:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-22 14:44 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-23 13:48 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-23 14:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-23 13:46 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-23 13:40 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-23 13:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-16 3:39 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFEAcA-1d_47g3Z3R=CNyE8U5+huJ0yDvAMU+BRacajxE5qPXw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox