ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Testing
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:39:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACVxJT9ogSSPKjKRcaPR_NngrOX=mofxSOAfmo2Kp70gA=ZnrQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559E4BF7.8050607@hitachi.com>

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Masami Hiramatsu
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> wrote:

> This may be an off-topic, but I'd like to ask the selftest for tools.
> Currently tools/testing/selftests tests the kernel itself, but
> there are many tools under tools/, like perf too.
>
> Those are not configured by the kconfig, but selftests are also needed
> for tools. I have a runtests script which is just a bit modified
> ftracetest for perf-probe. I'd like to integrate it to selftests
> but I'm not sure that is a scope of kselftests.

This confusion is partially created by peculiar place where people
who wrote testsuite put it.

Gentlemen,
testsuite should be first class citizen in toplevel test/ directory,
command to run it should be "make test" not "make kselftest".
Only placing it in very visible place and using names which are intuitive
and familiar from userspace (git's t/ directory, glibc "make test") will give
hope that other developers will notice it and start using and improving it.
Excuse me, but tools/testing/selftests is hopeless.

>> Perhaps we should have a central location that each test needs to add
>> the required configuration for it to be properly tested. Then if users
>> want to test various subsystems, they would look in this location for
>> the proper configs (be it a directory that has files of the tests they
>> represent, and contain the configs needed). Then there should be no
>> real barrier for people to run these tests.
>
> /proc/kconfig[.gz]? I think we can add a list of required kconfigs
> for each testcase and indicate it. Moreover, we can include it as
> a part of kconfig and introduce CONFIG_KSELFTEST to enable those
> configs :)

I think primary use case is this:
* user builds and reboots into kernel with his custom config,
* user runs "make test" from fresh build directory,
* test harness runs everything runnable and maybe reports necessary
  config options to run more

/proc/kconfig.gz should be kept strictly for runtime config.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-10 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-07  9:24 Mark Brown
2015-07-07 13:02 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2015-07-07 13:14   ` Mark Brown
2015-07-07 18:47     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-07 20:46       ` Kees Cook
2015-07-07 22:02         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-08 17:37           ` Mark Brown
2015-07-08 10:43       ` Mark Brown
2015-07-09 10:24       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-07-09 12:00         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-10 10:39         ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2015-07-10 14:02           ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-10 14:28             ` Alexey Dobriyan
2015-07-10 15:05             ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-10 15:54               ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-07 15:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-07 17:18   ` Mark Brown
2015-07-07 17:23     ` Julia Lawall
2015-07-07 17:24     ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-07 17:37       ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-07 17:52     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-07 18:28       ` Mark Brown
2015-07-07 22:51       ` Peter Hüwe
2015-07-20 15:53     ` Mel Gorman
2015-07-20 16:39       ` Shuah Khan
2015-07-07 19:21   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-08  7:54     ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-08  8:37       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-08 12:10         ` Jiri Kosina
2015-07-08 12:37           ` Josh Boyer
2015-07-08 17:32           ` Mark Brown
2015-07-12 10:21         ` Fengguang Wu
2015-07-08  9:52       ` Mark Brown
2015-07-12 11:15         ` Fengguang Wu
2015-07-13 18:34           ` Mark Brown
2015-07-14 14:22             ` Fengguang Wu
2015-07-14 15:38               ` Mark Brown
2015-07-15 14:21                 ` Fengguang Wu
2015-07-08  9:27   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-07-08 13:52     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-08 16:40       ` Kevin Hilman
2015-07-08 17:24         ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-08 18:42           ` Kevin Hilman
2015-07-09  4:23         ` Michael Ellerman
2015-07-09 18:08           ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACVxJT9ogSSPKjKRcaPR_NngrOX=mofxSOAfmo2Kp70gA=ZnrQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
    --cc=tyler.baker@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox