From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217868A7 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 12:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946571FAAA for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 12:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id wn1so1688492obc.30 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:07:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140528185748.GA30673@kroah.com> References: <537F3551.2070104@hitachi.com> <20140528153702.GU23991@suse.de> <20140528185748.GA30673@kroah.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:07:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: Linus Walleij To: Greg KH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] kernel testing standard List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:37:02PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: >> As LTP is reported to >> be sane these days for some tests, it could conceivably be wrapped by "make >> test" to avoid duplicating effort there. I think that would be worthwhile >> if someone had the time to push it because it would be an unconditional win. > > That is what I have been asking for for _years_. Hopefully someday > someone does this... Does this read "let's pull LTP into the kernel source tree"? I have a hard time seing what else it could mean. Yours, Linus Walleij