From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 913729EB for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66F3114B for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id r126so111784685oib.0 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 06:36:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4604090.shkXlmNYJ6@wuerfel> References: <4604090.shkXlmNYJ6@wuerfel> From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:36:51 +0200 Message-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , ksummit-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, Greg KH , Jens Axboe , hare@suse.de, Tejun Heo , Bart Van Assche , Omar Sandoval , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Addressing long-standing high-latency problems related to I/O List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > What file system did you use for testing, and which tuning > did you do for your storage devices? These were all with ext4. Yours, Linus Walleij