ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Konstantin Sinyuk <sinyuk@gmail.com>
Cc: ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Konstantin Sinyuk <konstantin.sinyuk@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [TECH TOPIC] UALink driver upstreaming
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:22:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda5KwVP-J=_3goL6WAy=dR1ZQufdjT6pJyY+Fno_Hsy6w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPpb9yn9akO=pBiQs0=xTcPGTY-XghK8nYcm0dAgQO1Es5udWw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 8:10 PM Konstantin Sinyuk <sinyuk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:42:01AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

> > So this gives at hand that since this is no "ordinary" memory-mapped
> > driver, it needs its own bus and therefore intuitively its own subsystem?
> >
> > What about drivers/accel/ual where other accelerators live?
> >
> > Or if that is somehow inappropriate, just drivers/ual, don't be shy.
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> For the initial RFC, I thought to start under drivers/misc/ just as a
> lightweight entry point to get early review. But I agree with you that
> UALink fits more naturally as its own subsystem, similar to how CXL is
> handled, rather than being grouped under accel. The long-term plan
> should definitely be drivers/ual/.

If you want to "ease in" drivers the appropriate place is drivers/staging.

But if you have a focused team and you are going to start small
and work on this then just use drivers/accel/ual from day 1.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-12  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-10 19:37 Sinyuk, Konstantin
2025-09-10 23:58 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-11  5:13 ` Greg KH
     [not found]   ` <a70edcba-0ef7-4d0d-bc00-0e8519a458e8@intel.com>
2025-09-11 11:13     ` Konstantin Sinyuk
2025-09-11 10:59 ` Mimi Zohar
     [not found]   ` <DM3PR11MB86833A11AD52C01C9063FFE1E309A@DM3PR11MB8683.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2025-09-11 11:09     ` FW: " Konstantin Sinyuk
2025-09-11 15:19 ` Linus Walleij
     [not found]   ` <a74382d8-a2bf-4534-b0ee-a97d8faabf16@intel.com>
2025-09-11 18:10     ` Konstantin Sinyuk
2025-09-11 19:02       ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-12  7:22       ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2025-09-12  7:47         ` Greg KH
     [not found]           ` <0f876c7c-566b-476a-b590-d490d41d605c@intel.com>
2025-09-12 12:07             ` Konstantin Sinyuk
2025-09-12 12:18               ` Linus Walleij
2025-09-12 13:49                 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-09-12 16:13                   ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-13 19:11                     ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACRpkda5KwVP-J=_3goL6WAy=dR1ZQufdjT6pJyY+Fno_Hsy6w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=konstantin.sinyuk@intel.com \
    --cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sinyuk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox