From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6894892 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3A931FD46 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id vb8so5425927obc.28 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20140511030009.GO12708@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140511083729.211e9b5f@lwn.net> <20140515121546.3A06AC40B0E@trevor.secretlab.ca> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:40:15 +0200 Message-ID: From: Linus Walleij To: Rob Herring Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Jason Cooper , Linux ARM Kernel Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] ARM legacy board DT conversion finalization List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > I do think having todo lists would be valuable. I would like to see > more than a one off list and have a living document. Linus W had a > great spreadsheet on this for multi-platform enablement. Perhaps this > would spur people to do some of the clean-ups (or it will just bit rot > :( ). It's still there: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aj_PQh-9xwkMdHRHYzRzOEhyMEt5b3UtOFIwcHRpWEE However I don't think there is much to discuss really. It's just work, we know how to do it. The real problem is that of somebody doing the work, and when maintainers don't want to do the work, how to proceed by leaving the platform as-is (legacy), delete it (lacking active maintainer) or have some custodian like me acquire the hardware and fix it up myself. Arnd and I have discussed this and we basically think that the StrongARM stuff (RISC PC, Netwinder, SA1100-based handhelds etc) are legacy systems while all ARMv4T and later are target for modernization if and only if an active maintainer is available to pursue the work. Yours, Linus Walleij