From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1D084B for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 19:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A82C67A6 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 19:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id y139-v6so5619285wmc.2 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 12:54:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Rodrigo Vivi Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 12:54:16 -0700 Message-ID: To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000096406105751106af" Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Challenges in Upstream vs. Embargoed Development in Intel Graphics. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --00000000000096406105751106af Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi there, I've submitted a proposal for plumber's referred track. There, I want to talk about tools and challenges we have on embargo development vs upstream one and how to get focus on upstream first and upstream always mentality. The name of plumbers proposal talk is: "Unveiling Intel Graphics Internal Development" I'm not sure if the talk will get accepted, but anyway I'd like to have the chance to talk to other maintainers to exchange views on different ways of maintaining this kind of embargo development including challenges, tools, processes, and rules. So I'm interested in hallway tracks of Maintainer / Kernel Summit, or maybe a bof session if there's interest. Please let me know if there's interested or if further information and/or clarification is needed. Thanks in advance, Rodrigo. --00000000000096406105751106af Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi there,

I've submitted= a proposal for plumber's referred track. There, I want to talk
about tools and challenges we have on embargo development vs upstream on= e and
how to get focus on upstream first and upstream always ment= ality.

The name of plumbers proposal talk is:
<= /div>
"Unveiling Intel Graphics Internal Development"

I'm not sure if the talk will get accepted, but anywa= y I'd like to have the
chance to talk to other maintainers to= exchange views on different ways of
maintaining this kind of emb= argo development including challenges, tools,
processes, and rule= s.

So I'm interested in hallway tracks of Main= tainer / Kernel Summit, or maybe a
bof session if there's int= erest.

Please let me know if there's intereste= d or if further information and/or
clarification is needed.

Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo.

--00000000000096406105751106af--