From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E15FC1164 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 20:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B2247A6 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 20:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id s12-v6so12622749wmc.0 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:09:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180904174242.GF2316@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20180904174242.GF2316@intel.com> From: Rodrigo Vivi Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:09:10 -0700 Message-ID: To: Rodrigo Vivi Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007d9c2d0575397731" Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Challenges in Upstream vs. Embargoed Development in Intel Graphics. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --0000000000007d9c2d0575397731 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" sorry for the duplication and for the noise. This was the original one that had been blocked because I wasn't yet subscribed but it was now approved by moderator generating the duplication. Sorry, Rodrigo. On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:37 PM Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi there, > > I've submitted a proposal for plumber's referred track. There, I want to > talk > about tools and challenges we have on embargo development vs upstream one > and > how to get focus on upstream first and upstream always mentality. > > The name of plumbers proposal talk is: > "Unveiling Intel Graphics Internal Development" > > I'm not sure if the talk will get accepted, but anyway I'd like to have the > chance to talk to other maintainers to exchange views on different ways of > maintaining this kind of embargo development including challenges, tools, > processes, and rules. > > So I'm interested in hallway tracks of Maintainer / Kernel Summit, or > maybe a > bof session if there's interest. > > Please let me know if there's interested or if further information and/or > clarification is needed. > > Thanks in advance, > Rodrigo. > _______________________________________________ > Ksummit-discuss mailing list > Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss > --0000000000007d9c2d0575397731 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
sorry for the duplication and for the noise.
This was = the original one that had been blocked because I=C2=A0 wasn't yet subsc= ribed but it was now approved by moderator generating the duplication.
Sorry,
Rodrigo.

<= div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:37 PM Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
Hi there,

I've submitted a proposal for plumber's referred track. There, I wa= nt to talk
about tools and challenges we have on embargo development vs upstream one a= nd
how to get focus on upstream first and upstream always mentality.

The name of plumbers proposal talk is:
"Unveiling Intel Graphics Internal Development"

I'm not sure if the talk will get accepted, but anyway I'd like to = have the
chance to talk to other maintainers to exchange views on different ways of<= br> maintaining this kind of embargo development including challenges, tools, processes, and rules.

So I'm interested in hallway tracks of Maintainer / Kernel Summit, or m= aybe a
bof session if there's interest.

Please let me know if there's interested or if further information and/= or
clarification is needed.

Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo.
_______________________________________________
Ksummit-discuss mailing list
Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/= mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss
--0000000000007d9c2d0575397731--