From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 978BD892 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E3D7157 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6278A20453 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com (mail-vk0-f42.google.com [209.85.213.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71C0F20411 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id x186so5949773vkd.1 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:25:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161028212310.GA25668@kroah.com> References: <20161028212310.GA25668@kroah.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:25:05 -0700 Message-ID: To: Greg KH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Jiri Kosina , Mark Brown , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Schedule slot suggestion- Generic drivers - core topic List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:16:59PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> Having some generic device driver load, prior to a specific driver, >> and issues / maintenance issues that come with the hacks currently in >> place to support this / re-invent the wheel to support this per >> subsystem. > > We have hacks for this today? What do you mean by this, quirks? The thread in question was rather huge, this was just *one* of the topics that came up, and I was not the one who brought it up. > People have been talking about this since the 2.4 days, but I have yet > to see any code for it. I'd love to see something be proposed, with > code, but note, you need to be aware of why it's been only talked about > for that long without any code being written :) Ah I see.. > Why can't this be done in email? Perhaps, and if so then saves us time. Luis