From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F0270A for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D771020339 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id gq1so4901941obb.22 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 09:12:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jwboyer@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20140509120144.3ce5657e@gandalf.local.home> References: <20140509152319.GA26823@thunk.org> <20140509154035.GE15523@thunk.org> <20140509120144.3ce5657e@gandalf.local.home> Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:12:34 -0400 Message-ID: From: Josh Boyer To: Steven Rostedt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Reminder for kernel summit nominations List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 9 May 2014 11:40:35 -0400 > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > >> -linux-kernel >> > >> I deliberately didn't include lists of names of "people that would be >> useful if we're going to have discussion X", since we that presupposes >> that we are definitely going to have a particular discussion. If you >> see someone who you think should attend regardless of whether we >> decide to include topic X, please send a separate nomination. > > I don't know why not. Even if we do not decide to talk about discussion > X, it does not hurt to add people that are useful to the discussion in > the nomination list. Just because they were mentioned, means they > probably have some importance to the kernel and should be considered. > > That doesn't mean that we are going to invite them, any more than we > would invite others on the list. That was kind of my thinking as well. Put another way, not having their name on any list guarantees they won't get an invite. I'd rather at least allow for the possibility... If it would be helpful, I can go back through the threads today and draft a topic specific nomination list of those not already on the list otherwise. josh