From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linus971@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20170625181954.GU1248@mtr-leonro.local> References: <20170625072423.GR1248@mtr-leonro.local> <20170625181954.GU1248@mtr-leonro.local> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 11:37:12 -0700 Message-ID: To: Leon Romanovsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Driver and/or module versions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > Great, so why are we continuing to allow patches with MODULE_VERSION and > DRIVER_VERSION changes? I suspect they just haven't caused problems elsewhere. And honestly, they aren't that common. Grepping for MODULE_VERSION and DRIVER_VERSION shows more than I would like, but we're talking hundreds, not thousands (and lots of them are basically dead, stale code - ATA etc, or just joke names - usb). Linus