From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER TOPIC] ABI feature gates?
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 23:39:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx0__GOf1BbM7w8K9A4mMJh8wGhsDK7J2MieHyBaX_2cQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878tiqr5eb.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:21 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> wrote:
>
> With this pattern, people can still trust an X.Y kernel,
I do *NOT* want people to trust an X.Y kernel.
Quite the opposite.
I want people to realize that the version doesn't matter, and that
they should feel safe in upgrading. The X and the Y don't matter, and
they *MUST*NOT*MATTER*.
If they do, the process is completely and utterly broken.
So what people should be able to trust is that they can always upgrade.
Not the shit that I see *ALL* the time, where you upgrade something,
and it breaks.
And no, the excuse "but the API was new in X.Y, so it could change in
X.Y+1" does *not* hold water.
It very much violates that basic principle of trust and makes people
go "I don't want to upgrade, because it might break something I do".
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-11 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-04 1:16 Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-04 1:30 ` Greg KH
2017-08-04 4:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-04 5:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-04 8:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-04 2:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-08-04 3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-04 5:13 ` Julia Lawall
2017-08-04 14:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-08-04 15:47 ` Julia Lawall
2017-08-04 8:42 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-08-04 8:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-04 16:04 ` Greg KH
2017-08-04 17:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-08-04 17:53 ` Greg KH
2017-08-04 22:52 ` Joe Perches
2017-08-09 20:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-14 19:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-08-14 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-15 7:13 ` Julia Lawall
2017-08-04 8:57 ` Julia Lawall
2017-08-04 11:27 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2017-08-09 0:00 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-09 11:54 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-08-14 20:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-08-09 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-11 6:21 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-11 6:39 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2017-08-11 8:02 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-11 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-14 4:19 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-14 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-14 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-14 23:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-15 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-08-15 16:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-15 18:26 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+55aFx0__GOf1BbM7w8K9A4mMJh8wGhsDK7J2MieHyBaX_2cQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox