From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334A5CFB for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 14:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (mail-it0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90A1102 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 14:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id p129-v6so25454568ite.3 for ; Sun, 09 Sep 2018 07:20:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180908082141.15d72684@coco.lan> <20180908113411.GA3111@kroah.com> <1536418829.22308.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20180908153235.GB11120@kroah.com> <1536422066.22308.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20180909125130.GA16474@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20180909125130.GA16474@kroah.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 07:20:07 -0700 Message-ID: To: Greg KH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: James Bottomley , mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Handling of embargoed security issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 5:51 AM Greg KH wrote: > > But remember, this is only needed for the "crazy" issues, like Meltdown. > What we put together add-hoc for L1TF worked well, and what we do every > week in handling security issues sent to security@k.org works very well > also. So well that no one really realizes what we do there :) Note that at some point, we should just say "f*ck it". For hardware bugs, we should remember that *we* aren't the ones that are in trouble. If a hardware company makes it too hard for us to work with them, we should literally say "go the f*ck away" and stop talking to them. It's *their* problem, not ours. If they only work with vendors unable to talk to core maintainers, I guarantee that it will *remain* their problem. I will happily tell the world that the hardware company screwed up and didn't even help us try to fix things right. Their lawyers and PR people can go screw themselves. Seriously. People need to be aware that it's not us that should be bending over backwards over hardware issues. If some hardware company wants an NDA from me for their own screw-ups, I'll laugh in their face, and then I'll tell journalists about how they actively made it harder to fix their mess. Linus