From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D11578A6 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com (mail-it0-f68.google.com [209.85.214.68]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDE37347 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id n68so16064455itn.3 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:04:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linus971@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <20161107075524.49d83697@vento.lan> <11020459.EheIgy38UF@wuerfel> <20161116182633.74559ffd@vento.lan> <2923918.nyphv1Ma7d@wuerfel> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:04:37 -0800 Message-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Including images on Sphinx documents List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > No. That is how I *noticed* the issue. Those stupid pdf binary files > have been around forever, I just didn't notice until the Fedora people > started complaining about the patches. Side note: my release patches these days enable both "--binary" and "-M", so they require "git apply" now. So we handle the binaries fine in patches now, but as mentioned, that was just what made me notice, it wasn't a fix for the deeper ("source") problem. Linus