ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: "ksummit@lists.linux.dev" <ksummit@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [3/4] Elevate handling of regressions that made it to releases deemed for end users
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:35:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e417917-91b9-4506-9fbe-d6436ed48b9e@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jzijeony.fsf@intel.com>

On 20.06.24 15:20, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024, Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> wrote:
>> On 13.06.24 13:34, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 10:34:17AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to make the language somewhat stronger.
>>>>
>>>> """Handle mainline regressions that recently made it into a proper
>>>> mainline, stable, or longterm release (either directly or via backport)
>>>> with an even higher priority and try to fix them as fast as possible.
>>>> [...] Aim hard to mainline a fix by Sunday after the next, if the
>>>
>>> Are we really telling people, some of them contributing in their spare
>>> time, that they have to work during weekends ?
>>
>> To clarify: I'm not asking for that at all. The aim for Sunday is only
>> here because Linus usually releases new -rc's on Sunday evenings, which
>> quite a few people seem to use. So from the regressions point of view
>> it's better to flush fixes to Linus late in the week (say on Friday --
>> or if you want on Sat or Sun, which some subsystem do), and not on a
>> Monday, as people that use -rcs otherwise will run into the regression
>> for yet another week -- and sometimes report it again, when the fix was
>> just mainlined.
>>
>> What wording can avoid this? "By the end of the (current/next) week"
>> maybe? In business context that afaik usually mean Fridays, but I'm not
>> a native speaker, so might be wrong there.
> 
> Perhaps try wording it in terms of -rc/release instead of calendar?

Not totally against that, but the thing is: in a earlier local draft it
used to be like that. And then I noticed that this will add another week
when it comes to the merge window.

And for a mainline regressions that makes quite a difference at a (from
the users perspective) crucial point of time: during and right after the
window during witch distros like Arch Linux and openSUSE Tumbleweed
usually switch to the newest mainline release or stable release derived
from it (Fedora is usually a bit later).

Ciao, Thorsten

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-20 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-13  8:22 [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [0/4] Common scenario for four proposals regarding regressions Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13  8:26 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [1/4] Create written down guidelines for handling regressions Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-09-12 13:33   ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13  8:32 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [2/4] Ensure recent mainline regression are fixed in latest stable series Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 11:02   ` Johannes Berg
2024-06-13 11:21     ` Greg KH
2024-06-13 13:18       ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-13 11:17   ` Jiri Kosina
2024-06-13 11:28   ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-14  0:50     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 14:01   ` Mark Brown
2024-06-14 14:32     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-06-13  8:34 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [3/4] Elevate handling of regressions that made it to releases deemed for end users Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 11:34   ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-13 11:39     ` Jiri Kosina
2024-06-14 14:10       ` Mark Brown
2024-06-18 12:58         ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-19 20:25           ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-20 10:47             ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 15:56     ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-06-18 12:24     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-20 13:20       ` Jani Nikula
2024-06-20 13:35         ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2024-06-20 14:16           ` Mark Brown
2024-06-21  6:47           ` Jiri Kosina
2024-06-21 10:19             ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13  8:42 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [4/4] Discuss how to better prevent backports of commits that turn out to cause regressions Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13  9:59   ` Jan Kara
2024-06-13 10:18     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 14:08     ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14  9:19       ` Lee Jones
2024-06-14  9:24         ` Lee Jones
2024-06-14 12:27         ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14 14:26           ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14 14:36             ` Lee Jones
2024-06-14 14:29       ` Michael Ellerman
2024-06-14 14:38         ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14 14:44           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-06-14 15:08           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-15 11:29             ` Michael Ellerman
2024-06-17 10:15             ` Jani Nikula
2024-06-17 12:42               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-14 15:45           ` Mark Brown
2024-06-14 14:43         ` Mark Brown
2024-06-14 14:51           ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14 15:42             ` Mark Brown
2024-06-14 14:43         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 14:57           ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-16  1:13         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-16  3:28           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-16  4:59             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-16  8:22               ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-16  9:05               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-16 15:07               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-17 13:48               ` Dan Carpenter
2024-06-17 15:23                 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-06-17 14:39               ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-17 16:04                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-17 16:06                   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-17 16:14                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-17 16:18                       ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-17 17:11                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-18 12:05                 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-06-16  7:26           ` Takashi Iwai
2024-06-16  8:10           ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-16 11:31             ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-16 11:39             ` Takashi Iwai
2024-06-16 16:40             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-16  8:31           ` Jiri Kosina
2024-06-16  8:54             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-13 19:39     ` Dan Carpenter
2024-06-14  1:00       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-13 11:58   ` James Bottomley
2024-06-13 13:06     ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-13 13:56       ` James Bottomley
2024-06-13 14:02         ` Greg KH
2024-06-13 15:11           ` James Bottomley
2024-06-13 16:27             ` Greg KH
2024-06-14 18:47             ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-17 10:59               ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-06-13 18:08         ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-13 13:45     ` Greg KH
2024-06-13 13:40   ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-18 13:12     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 14:28   ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-13 18:14     ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-14 14:41       ` Jan Kara
2024-06-14 15:03         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-06-14 17:46           ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-18 14:43 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [0/4] Common scenario for four proposals regarding regressions James Bottomley
2024-06-18 15:50   ` Mark Brown
2024-06-20 10:32   ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-20 12:57     ` James Bottomley
2024-06-20 13:55       ` Mark Brown
2024-06-20 14:01         ` James Bottomley
2024-06-20 14:42           ` Mark Brown
2024-06-20 16:02             ` James Bottomley
2024-06-20 17:15               ` Mark Brown
2024-06-20 23:25               ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-21  6:33                 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
     [not found]               ` <20240625175131.672d14a4@rorschach.local.home>
2024-06-26  7:36                 ` Greg KH
2024-06-26 18:32                   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-26 19:05                     ` James Bottomley
2024-07-25 10:14                   ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-07-25 13:14                     ` Greg KH
2024-06-20 16:59       ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-20 23:18         ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e417917-91b9-4506-9fbe-d6436ed48b9e@leemhuis.info \
    --to=linux@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox