From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hare@suse.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53431908
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:26:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com (smtp.nue.novell.com [195.135.221.5])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80BFB19E
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:26:55 +0000 (UTC)
To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <20160719034717.GA24189@swordfish>
	<20160921044156.GA486@swordfish> <20161031065435.GA458@swordfish>
	<20161031135617.bs7df7kur23gvm6b@thunk.org>
	<20161031145655.GA433@swordfish>
	<20161031161824.3knff5u3m6mipelv@thunk.org>
	<20161031182133.GA490@swordfish>
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Message-ID: <942546fc-0de1-a253-05f3-e9e39020e0c9@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:26:45 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161031182133.GA490@swordfish>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On 10/31/2016 07:21 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (10/31/16 12:18), Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:56:55PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>>> ok, thanks. I personally will have some conflicts on Wed - "Open
>>> panel for discussing MM problems" and some of LPC microconfs.
>>
>> would 10:00am (after the MM panel) work for you and others?
>
> speaking for myself only,
> if there are no better options, then I'm OK with Wed 10am. I'd like
> to be in Sweeney AB starting from 11:20am, but can sacrifice it, if
> need be (in case if 10am doesn't work for someone. or if 1hr won't
> be enough (which is quite likely)). so let's hear from others.
>
>>> and I'd love to change the topic name since async printk is just
>>> 25% of the issue we want to discuss. the list I'm looking at now
>>> is as follows:
>>>
>>> 1) deadlocks in printk and printk recursion
>>> 2) async printk
>>> 3) pr_cont
>>> 4) console semaphore scalability and problems
>>
>> So a topic name like "printk improvements" would be better?
>
> "printk considered harmful" sounds good as well :) but "printk improvements"
> can surely work.
>
I'd like to join, too.
Personally I would prefer Tue, but the proposed time on Wed would work 
for me, too.

Cheers,

Hannes