Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful

[Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>]

On 10/31/2016 07:21 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (10/31/16 12:18), Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:56:55PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>>> ok, thanks. I personally will have some conflicts on Wed - "Open
>>> panel for discussing MM problems" and some of LPC microconfs.
>>
>> would 10:00am (after the MM panel) work for you and others?
>
> speaking for myself only,
> if there are no better options, then I'm OK with Wed 10am. I'd like
> to be in Sweeney AB starting from 11:20am, but can sacrifice it, if
> need be (in case if 10am doesn't work for someone. or if 1hr won't
> be enough (which is quite likely)). so let's hear from others.
>
>>> and I'd love to change the topic name since async printk is just
>>> 25% of the issue we want to discuss. the list I'm looking at now
>>> is as follows:
>>>
>>> 1) deadlocks in printk and printk recursion
>>> 2) async printk
>>> 3) pr_cont
>>> 4) console semaphore scalability and problems
>>
>> So a topic name like "printk improvements" would be better?
>
> "printk considered harmful" sounds good as well :) but "printk improvements"
> can surely work.
>
I'd like to join, too.
Personally I would prefer Tue, but the proposed time on Wed would work 
for me, too.

Cheers,

Hannes