From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A750EC433DF for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C2FC2084C for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Hut5TGrF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6C2FC2084C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B3B87EDB; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:02:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ocdhnv04gvHp; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC4887F01; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93852C08A5; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2716DC08A2 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C92C8957A for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:01:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id opcEjdvrH-un for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:01:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ot1-f65.google.com (mail-ot1-f65.google.com [209.85.210.65]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 732598957C for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f65.google.com with SMTP id w17so2051842otl.4 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:01:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HGsTAj0a+RJU0QpPTNKQCpJ0VMDb7tRPj2FxIP6m4t4=; b=Hut5TGrFUZogrXJQXiJE+1pBXG9vA76Jx7ZETGuglXnVW7ytEkhFxIDwsUz1tW+fdO sAmFlnROS04w5zHgxmyNFSE60rNlwJzCzyZuEv8zQp19h6BO2BTMZqjp0MflhaEzmI77 aQPbvFT78Bl6N/NOg983Nu+i7kNkvSFuiEDNg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HGsTAj0a+RJU0QpPTNKQCpJ0VMDb7tRPj2FxIP6m4t4=; b=giYY5FofyhT96vgXTRIPVk36VzKbAuKMEe2kmYgkFIusycYuc906PyoTuRxPvMyQOA wIVMP+U7cAh+omj+Mc30wYRZQryyogz2A6MYOXkwGUeajkhr8mtn2cm0HtctAIfJUiaT dcUffsv7YPh9IKpIKg6i+CSQ+Z1yeIri5jH22synljZA6bg2Z731dqPhdwsp1tCMbK2i LZNq3MX0DFkN0GtBlDu2GNN49EBcMSPKPIoysN7EwTqTjD+2H/38U7CHW/+J6v0pMZJj n27gpLqF70M8H6c0ghfxuaDflWdvfmvBOc91o4pl+e6/kkd+OGOe8Pr927whVuHHur1B E1Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532SdtviG/rbkWtKKtl1+XBQk81NeN8p3FZyc1h1mxzxwK16ldXn YRrEoDmkgKZRh1sbS4kM98Be8RKZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSOkqrlj+FklRoHpl9zpHklPVNbBXZvIvMzH7Yy2NJWfyT4uBUMIfZY07N/M8ALuniqIU6Qw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1f22:: with SMTP id e2mr17125025oth.62.1594310479762; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.112] (c-24-9-64-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [24.9.64.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n6sm578331otq.33.2020.07.09.09.01.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:01:19 -0700 (PDT) To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tibor Raschko References: <79214066-3886-e0ef-f26e-8cb3d53404be@linuxfoundation.org> <20200709124327.369781a0@coco.lan> From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: <93fc3afb-8c3f-0fb9-3b92-adfb6571e060@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 10:01:18 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200709124327.369781a0@coco.lan> Content-Language: en-US Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Chris Mason Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" On 7/9/20 4:43 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 7 Jul 2020 01:58:21 +0200 > Tibor Raschko escreveu: > >>> Allowlist/denylist terms are intuitive and action based which have a >>> globally uniform meaning. >> >> Nobody has a problem understanding "blacklist" and "whitelist". These >> are universally understood words even outside of computing. Claiming >> that we need clearer alternatives is smoke and mirrors. > > Actually, as a non-native English speaker, the first time I saw > "list", I had to do some research in order to understand what it > means :-) Thanks for the perspective. This is why we need clear and uniform words. Our community is global. English isn't English everywhere either. > > That reminds me: what about "graylist"? > > For coherency, if "blacklist/whitelist" won't be used anymore, an > alternative to graylist should also be provided. > > Right now, it seems that only ACPI uses it: > > $ git grep -i graylist > drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c:static void acpi_pm_check_graylist(struct pci_dev *dev) > drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c: acpi_pm_check_graylist); > drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c: acpi_pm_check_graylist); > What is "graylist"? Does it mean in between allow/deny? thanks, -- Shuah _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss