From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lamorak.hansenpartnership.com (lamorak.hansenpartnership.com [198.37.111.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500B02765EA for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.37.111.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755617033; cv=none; b=lBfZJwPHAqm2oh0SH8C/wjUEdq0S9XwWbB0wQM2jFJ2pr7DYQ3881JgkC2stCDIZo7pBLpfT1zJZ6n2GTKgOagxMg2kL5JYhpqWSaZ/WHwrHKs4aCx6hIIZWzkgjZoeHmXHDNeIYF3jReYKrWrn2BhruMbN0pemstZRf2/SZEUw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755617033; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Cdsjji01jaxcuxsa8bG+72C8jNGDd8pmA2f1uT4Dd3Y=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gKfSKDFWzqmri2h1evqwvhrZ/ET+FPHiU2HTVjYRVYwE7YTWb298BnpuZAj5+FomsMLNf6S+nSCtsyMUe4HGyFHSGkBWtkrzhvO1OpOLgnEd26kLqAYRy3Zpc7OYTR2jgUobixFfmPnzwCG1uuBlIXYeO2AjBxq8HVR1/CVO1GQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=HansenPartnership.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=HansenPartnership.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b=ftm27UyK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.37.111.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=HansenPartnership.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=HansenPartnership.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="ftm27UyK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1755617029; bh=Cdsjji01jaxcuxsa8bG+72C8jNGDd8pmA2f1uT4Dd3Y=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:From; b=ftm27UyKNE7j6uzmtPVep70qpbTz0pt9RldPQNFUWeCHlFSWudefEnlm7vEZlg02B jyIxBMck+iueTjBfHgrvOYoSu9Cg91KxLtrwBWWqPjExrCzhXn0DFgYJJQYLTpZXq3 dDkC8K+opjO/1FA+G3+kAS0GNLYRoLIQLaeXQ5YI= Received: from ehlo.thunderbird.net (unknown [IPv6:2a00:23c8:1023:8d01:db56:7598:3eda:860b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lamorak.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 985AC1C024D; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 11:23:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:23:46 +0100 From: James Bottomley To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "Paul E. McKenney" CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sasha Levin , Jiri Kosina , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BMAINTAINERS_SUMMIT=5D_Annotating?= =?US-ASCII?Q?_patches_containing_AI-assisted_code?= User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20250818230729.106a8c48@foz.lan> References: <1npn33nq-713r-r502-p5op-q627pn5555oo@fhfr.pbz> <12ded49d-daa4-4199-927e-ce844f4cfe67@kernel.org> <9020e75d-361f-457f-9def-330d8964f431@paulmck-laptop> <20250818230729.106a8c48@foz.lan> Message-ID: <9383F8DB-CD38-40CC-B91D-7F98E8156C04@HansenPartnership.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On August 18, 2025 10:07:29 PM GMT+01:00, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >Em Tue, 12 Aug 2025 07:42:21 -0700 >"Paul E=2E McKenney" escreveu: [=2E=2E=2E] > do agree that many of the lawsuits seem to be motivated by an >> overwhelmening desire to monetize the output of AI that was induced by >> someone else's prompts, if that is what you are getting at=2E It does = seem >> to me personally that after you have sliced and diced the training data= , >> fair use should apply, but last I checked, fair use was a USA-only thin= g=2E > >Maybe, but other Countries have similar concepts=2E I remember I saw an >interpretation of the Brazilian copyright law once from a famous layer >at property rights matter, stating that reproducing small parts of a book= ,=20 >for instance, could be ok, under certain circumstances (in a concept >similar to US fair use)=2E Yes, technically=2E Article 10 of the Berne convention contains a weaker = concept allowing quotations without encumbrance based on a three prong test= that the quote isn't extensive, doesn't rob the rights holder of substant= ial royalties and doesn't unreasonably prejudice the existing copyright rig= hts=2E Regards, James --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E