Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Issues with stable process

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>]

On 16 July 2015 10:19:04 BST, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 21:25 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:24:10 +1000
>> NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > > I just use the rule of thumb: must be in -next for two days
>because then
>> > > I know 0day (and the other checkers) have also run.
>> > 
>> > Do you *really* know that?
>> > Given that there seems to be value in knowing "0day has run
>> > successfully", should we ask for an interface to do exactly that?
>> > 
>> 
>> There's an opt-in with Fengguang Wu's 0day tests to have it email you
>> when it finishes with "SUCCESS". I have that, as I don't do pushes
>for
>> any patches until I see that.
>
>How?  Is there actually some sort of interface to 0day? (/me has been
>rather lazy and simply emails requests to Fengguang).  Detail would be
>great to share.

Fengguang said back in Edinburgh to email him if you want success messages.

Don't think that has changed. I emailed across the room and been getting them ever since :) 
As with others I hold pull requests until they come in.

Jonathan
>
>James
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ksummit-discuss mailing list
>Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.