From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C5B52C0298 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755811097; cv=none; b=O1ynS8USPusLVsRp4z2M43fe44QIh9Sg+YURqpmC3SLwiIqx+4TLZFr2GHJ/WAkS1IsuwI2rgeth65Q+J75uKJH7Qbe0sT3Mk49djw2ydIMOcBt/CKegeEBKA/xRGO2PZ4s9Mly3CTIqREVKYeA5yScFzZp7g++sJ+4wAXFOSec= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755811097; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I1+FBUWGfJE2eGpB2FW589wtohWKGnYzQntqihoe88I=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QvTOeom1ZM/YdGAelufXewYrJCHPbgxjH443h8sgENij0GsKyVDQf2X9bI+ul0w4p834pQ5wmsSpkqAF22DCwy2/w5OXB5j3yDdFOt5MIOL7Vj7g+ekfk98DGx2VlS2jAhiTequ7JoR9N9uBUkUbeVY1pihVm7IWJZh55LeNj3g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=T63Ria4i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="T63Ria4i" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5806DC4CEEB; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:18:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755811096; bh=I1+FBUWGfJE2eGpB2FW589wtohWKGnYzQntqihoe88I=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=T63Ria4ih9BEVOI4/6/VoBE/5AlGYhjsnb6AhzSrD4YkMLTBp4JC1Sd/JP/xWxaO+ 50Lb9qTXmdlCmRxlxb6eRDMFSbrYfJby4umqifDfjzKGw9GqJCbIRy1EEkC/w+GXEY HGEFcSATmsr8i2afvE5cLHrrOcHbo/I16FHhl7iVcXc45dEMdFgLJtr+6Y28L7eszE 0WIurTLJmV7cdXhEblm0fmN9L2WSBoD4Frg/BMeBDE02kjVTSjbj2Yt/dirresuHaR ndWmyRcHTEc4EgTi6n7nZpkvzAbB7yqF9Q5wXqGY24FjLFLRJlfCG+OlmIGNfxSXRM B4a3i5LB5Rm4A== Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 23:18:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , James Bottomley , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Annotating patches containing AI-assisted code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <913nn653-9797-0s7s-p8p8-n91so300ppq0@xreary.bet> References: <1npn33nq-713r-r502-p5op-q627pn5555oo@fhfr.pbz> <12ded49d-daa4-4199-927e-ce844f4cfe67@kernel.org> <9020e75d-361f-457f-9def-330d8964f431@paulmck-laptop> <20250818230729.106a8c48@foz.lan> <9383F8DB-CD38-40CC-B91D-7F98E8156C04@HansenPartnership.com> <4tacplepoih3wvejopmtkdg7ujtvwmufd5teiozk5im2jikn7a@jdbou6kwindl> <20250821122329.03c77178@foz.lan> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 21 Aug 2025, Jiri Kosina wrote: > And one of the points why I originally brought this up is that I believe > we need either (a) be able to take the informed decision/risk by applying > a patch we know has been written by AI, or (b) be able to outright reject > it on that basis (e.g. if it's too complicated). ... and again, that's leaving all the legal aspects (which need to be figured out as well, of course) aside. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs