From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE3D114C for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 782B827B for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:56:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Jani Nikula To: Shuah Khan , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , clm@fb.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, Jonathan Corbet , olof@lxom.net, rostedt@goodmis.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:56:04 +0300 Message-ID: <87tvmdvoaj.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Review - Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Shuah Khan wrote: > This decision to change the existing "Code of Conflict" signed off by > a large number of developers, has been changed and committed with a > few people signing off on it. While I support the change itself, this does bother me as well. Is the implication that further discussion on this is futile? Fire-and-forget is not exactly the best approach for rolling out a code of conduct. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center