From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AADDAAC for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C5715A for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:09:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Jani Nikula To: Takashi Iwai , Jiri Kosina In-Reply-To: References: <1de3c642-a4b7-1065-5c35-ba32866d471d@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:12:29 +0300 Message-ID: <87shikb6iq.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Bug reporting feedback loop List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:12:09 +0200, > Jiri Kosina wrote: >> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> >> > - The inconsistent bug tracking over the whole kernel areas: >> > which way to report purely depends on the subsystem. Even inside a >> > subsystem, some prefer bugzilla while some don't. >> >> Agreed that this might be annoying for the reporters, but I don't think we >> want to go towards pushing maintainers to use one unified solution. That'd >> be counter-productive. > > I don't pursue that, either. It'd be great, though, if we can reduce > the too much differences. The variety is the strength of open source, > but in this case... The least we can do is use the MAINTAINERS "B:" tag to document the preferences of each subsystem or driver. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center