From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38DA3ECE for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D953FA8 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:55:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Jani Nikula To: Julia Lawall In-Reply-To: References: <20180906094158.1eba4f50@canb.auug.org.au> <20180905222437.5d2a1730@vmware.local.home> <20180907091842.6c55bd9a@canb.auug.org.au> <87zhwtybr3.fsf@intel.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:54:37 +0300 Message-ID: <87r2i5y6n6.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] API replacement/deprecation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 07 Sep 2018, Julia Lawall wrote: > I came up with the following Coccinelle semantic patch. The advantage is > that it can also give a hint as to what should be done. The intent is > that it should be easily extensible. The only real downside that I can see is that it centralizes the deprecation information in the semantic patch instead of the functions themselves. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center