From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E41CB2B for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9879D18E for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:22:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Jani Nikula To: Markus Heiser In-Reply-To: <87y40rei5z.fsf@intel.com> References: <20161107075524.49d83697@vento.lan> <20161107170133.4jdeuqydthbbchaq@x> <8737j0hpi0.fsf@intel.com> <87shr0g90r.fsf@intel.com> <87y40rei5z.fsf@intel.com> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:22:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87pom2clcp.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Including images on Sphinx documents List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Markus Heiser wrote: >> Could this POC persuade you, if so, I send a more elaborate RFC, >> what do you think about? > > Sorry, I do not wish to be part of this. That was uncalled for, apologies. Like I said, I don't think this is the right approach. Call it an unsubstantiated gut feel coming from experience. However, I do not have the time to properly dig into this either, and that frustrates me. I wish I could be more helpful, but I can't right now. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center