From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129AEC49ED7 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 08:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74B8205F4 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 08:56:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E74B8205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849B8A70; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 08:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366E149F for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 08:56:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94508711 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 08:56:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Sep 2019 01:56:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,532,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="202667604" Received: from reichelh-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.54.127]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2019 01:56:05 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Doug Anderson , Laurent Pinchart In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <156821693963.2951081.11214256396118531359.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <434c05bddd2b364e607e565227487910a8dd9793.1568391461.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> <20190918123620.GA6306@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20190918105728.24e7eb48@coco.lan> <20190919065447.GF2959@kadam> <20190920145352.GI12950@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 11:56:06 +0300 Message-ID: <87k1a2yqmx.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , ksummit , Dan Carpenter , Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] media: add a subsystem profile documentation X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:54 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> And remove Kees Cook and Colin King ? :-) Jokes aside, brushing up >> get_maintainer.pl a bit is a good idea. I'm for instance not sure adding >> LKML automatically is a good idea if other mailing lists are already >> CC'ed, as it's a bit of a /dev/null (albeit with logging, so CC'ing it >> when no other mailing list is appropriate certainly makes sense). > > Please don't do this, as it means the patch won't be findable on the > "LKML" patchwork instance at: > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/ > > Having LKML copied on all patches is also nice because it makes it > easier to respond to a patch that was posted to a list you didn't > subscribe to. I subscribe to LKML and have it redirected to a folder > that I never look at. Then if I want to find an email thread I can > search that folder and easily respond from within my normal email > client. > > Is there any downside to CCing LKML? I think the question becomes, do we want *everything* posted to LKML? For example, based on the last 30 days, the kernel the monthly addition to LKML traffic from my corner of the kernel would be in this ballpark: $ notmuch count date:30d.. to:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org or to:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org and not to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org and subject:PATCH 96904 OTOH LKML is already a firehose that's impossible to drink from, so not much difference there... BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss