From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 113EDC7A for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1315782 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:10:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Jani Nikula To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab In-Reply-To: <20180910095123.4d83fd9c@coco.lan> References: <20180906094158.1eba4f50@canb.auug.org.au> <20180905222437.5d2a1730@vmware.local.home> <20180907091842.6c55bd9a@canb.auug.org.au> <87zhwtybr3.fsf@intel.com> <87r2i5y6n6.fsf@intel.com> <20180910095123.4d83fd9c@coco.lan> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:10:22 +0300 Message-ID: <87ftyg315d.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] API replacement/deprecation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > IMHO, whatever solution, the best would be to have a makefile > target equivalent to allmodconfig and allyesconfig that would > add such extra maintainership logic. There's 'make W=n' for enabling extra gcc checks. Seems like a good fit. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center