From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E7DCBC8 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from osg.samsung.com (osg.samsung.com [64.30.133.232]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8C64F7 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:16:33 +0000 (UTC) To: James Bottomley , Theodore Ts'o , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Shuah Khan References: <20171013001534.x35ipyu5fg3pdbaa@thunk.org> <20171020021929.y6huqssdny543gyz@thunk.org> <0c7dea93-caee-b91c-3932-a084066e257a@osg.samsung.com> <1508513264.3064.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: <8510ff38-c54a-cb33-0a92-8ba6363dcd51@osg.samsung.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:16:31 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1508513264.3064.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Draft Agenda for the Kernel Summit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 10/20/2017 09:27 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 08:31 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 10/19/2017 08:19 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:15:34PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Wednesday >>>> ========= >>>> >>>> 11:55 Kselftest use-cases (Shuah Khan) >>> >>> I'm finalizing the schedule for the kernel summit, and I wanted to >>> check in with you about whether (a) you think this topic is still a >>> useful one for us to have, and (b) whether you will be available / >>> the >>> best person to lead the topic. >>> >> >> Hi Ted, >> >> Sorry - I have been traveling didn't get back to you earlier. >> I haven't seen much response to my original posting, so I am >> not very sure how useful people think this would be as a topic. >> >> If you need to drop this in favor of another topic, it would be >> fine. > > Actually, it would be really useful to do an overview for people who > run git trees of what resources are available to us for easy tree > testing.  Most people are aware of linux-next and 0day, but fewer > understand how to customise the tests of the latter and get email > failure reports on specific branches.  I suspect even fewer know how to > run their own CI based on something like kselftests or xfstests. > Awesome. I can go over how to and various use-cases and how I am using kselftest for stable realease testing. thanks, -- Shuah