From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
clm@fb.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
olof@lxom.net, rostedt@goodmis.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Review - Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 12:10:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82d32d94-1312-7d0d-6453-1749f5cec954@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1538670475.4003.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On 10/04/2018 10:27 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 08:24 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> I have been trying to follow various threads on this topic and none
>> of them address the review of this patch that went in. There is no
>> mistake in the title of this topic. I do consider this topic to be
>> more general than limited to Maintainer Summit. Hence, the choice of
>> a wider Technical designation.
>>
>> So I am kicking off a thread to do the review with my comments. I am
>> in general agreement with the spirit of this change to the existing
>> "Code of Conflict".
>
> Just as an FYI, the Zephyr project recently included the contributor
> covenant CoC minus the enforcement clause. They did a standard github
> PR for this:
>
> https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/10356
>
> They note that they may add more enforcement details when the community
> agrees on them.
>
Thanks for the link. It is almost identical to the Code of Conduct that
went into Linux 4.19-rc4 minus the enforcement section.
It would make sense to remove the enforcement section and discuss and
add enforcement after the usual patch review process we already have
in place.
I personally would prefer amending the CoC in Linux 4.19 removing the
enforcement details over waiting to discuss at the Maintainer and/or
Kernel summit and releasing Linux 4.19 with the CoC v1 as it reads now.
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-05 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-24 14:24 Shuah Khan
2018-09-24 17:51 ` James Morris
2018-09-24 18:11 ` John W. Linville
2018-09-24 19:54 ` Josh Triplett
2018-09-24 20:46 ` Olof Johansson
2018-09-24 22:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-25 4:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-25 6:21 ` Olof Johansson
2018-09-25 8:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-25 16:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-25 20:03 ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-25 6:46 ` Dan Williams
2018-09-24 19:31 ` Jason Cooper
2018-09-26 20:57 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-24 23:15 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-25 1:35 ` Joe Perches
2018-09-26 6:54 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-26 9:19 ` Jan Kara
2018-09-26 9:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-09-26 12:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-26 16:43 ` Mark Brown
2018-09-26 17:03 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-26 12:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-26 12:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-09-26 14:01 ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-25 10:56 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-25 13:38 ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-09-25 15:22 ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-25 16:51 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-26 8:04 ` Laura Abbott
2018-09-26 14:47 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-27 8:30 ` Laura Abbott
2018-10-04 16:27 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-05 18:10 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2018-10-06 21:39 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-07 15:27 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82d32d94-1312-7d0d-6453-1749f5cec954@kernel.org \
--to=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=olof@lxom.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox