From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [0/4] Common scenario for four proposals regarding regressions
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:14:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <813a6d1d-586b-467a-b4db-30d3b5e022cf@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024062651-skyward-stowaway-6ea6@gregkh>
On 26.06.24 09:36, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 05:51:31PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:02:21 -0400
>> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
>>
>>> After all, given that stable is now delaying backports in the merge
>>> window, there should be at least a 2 week period where .0 is it
>>> (although it's also the two week period where we're not paying
>>> attention ...)
>>
>> I'm curious. Is there a stable branch that adds the stable patches in
>> continuously? That is, during the merge window, to have a branch that
>> adds the stable patches as they come in and then when the merge window
>> closes, to post the rc series with all the patches that have landed in
>> that branch?
>
> Yes, it's in the stable-queue git tree. And in the linux-stable-rc tree
> for those that can not consume quilt trees. Been there for years...
Out of curiosity, as I seem to be missing something here:
Steven afaics asked for "continuously […] during the merge window" and
the answer apparently made a few people (including myself) happy. But I
can't see anything like that. Were you just busy with other stuff this
merge window and didn't get around to pick up the changes, or did I look
at the wrong place?
I occasionally kept an eye on the trees you mentioned during in the past
few days and the branches/directories for 6.10.y in stable-queue and the
linux-stable-rc afaics have afaics been non existent until a few days
ago before you started to prepare 6.10.1 -- and since that one was
released ~20 hours ago those branches/directories do not contain any
additional changes.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=linux-6.10.y
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/pending
I assume that will change over the next few days shortly before or after
the merge window -- at least that how I remember it from previous
cycles. But until then there is afaics no way to test the current stack
of changes that likely will end up in one of the next 6.10.y releases --
or is there and I just missed it somehow?
Ciao, Thorsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-25 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-13 8:22 Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 8:26 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [1/4] Create written down guidelines for handling regressions Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-09-12 13:33 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 8:32 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [2/4] Ensure recent mainline regression are fixed in latest stable series Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 11:02 ` Johannes Berg
2024-06-13 11:21 ` Greg KH
2024-06-13 13:18 ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-13 11:17 ` Jiri Kosina
2024-06-13 11:28 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-14 0:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 14:01 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-14 14:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-06-13 8:34 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [3/4] Elevate handling of regressions that made it to releases deemed for end users Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 11:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-13 11:39 ` Jiri Kosina
2024-06-14 14:10 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-18 12:58 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-19 20:25 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-20 10:47 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 15:56 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-06-18 12:24 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-20 13:20 ` Jani Nikula
2024-06-20 13:35 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-20 14:16 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-21 6:47 ` Jiri Kosina
2024-06-21 10:19 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 8:42 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [4/4] Discuss how to better prevent backports of commits that turn out to cause regressions Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 9:59 ` Jan Kara
2024-06-13 10:18 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 14:08 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14 9:19 ` Lee Jones
2024-06-14 9:24 ` Lee Jones
2024-06-14 12:27 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14 14:26 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14 14:36 ` Lee Jones
2024-06-14 14:29 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-06-14 14:38 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14 14:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-06-14 15:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-15 11:29 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-06-17 10:15 ` Jani Nikula
2024-06-17 12:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-14 15:45 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-14 14:43 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-14 14:51 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-14 15:42 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-14 14:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 14:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-16 1:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-16 3:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-16 4:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-16 8:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-16 9:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-16 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-17 13:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-06-17 15:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-06-17 14:39 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-17 16:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-17 16:06 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-17 16:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-17 16:18 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-06-17 17:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-18 12:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-06-16 7:26 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-06-16 8:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-16 11:31 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-06-16 11:39 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-06-16 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-16 8:31 ` Jiri Kosina
2024-06-16 8:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-13 19:39 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-06-14 1:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-13 11:58 ` James Bottomley
2024-06-13 13:06 ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-13 13:56 ` James Bottomley
2024-06-13 14:02 ` Greg KH
2024-06-13 15:11 ` James Bottomley
2024-06-13 16:27 ` Greg KH
2024-06-14 18:47 ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-17 10:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-06-13 18:08 ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-13 13:45 ` Greg KH
2024-06-13 13:40 ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-18 13:12 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-13 14:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-13 18:14 ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-14 14:41 ` Jan Kara
2024-06-14 15:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-06-14 17:46 ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-18 14:43 ` [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [0/4] Common scenario for four proposals regarding regressions James Bottomley
2024-06-18 15:50 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-20 10:32 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-20 12:57 ` James Bottomley
2024-06-20 13:55 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-20 14:01 ` James Bottomley
2024-06-20 14:42 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-20 16:02 ` James Bottomley
2024-06-20 17:15 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-20 23:25 ` Sasha Levin
2024-06-21 6:33 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
[not found] ` <20240625175131.672d14a4@rorschach.local.home>
2024-06-26 7:36 ` Greg KH
2024-06-26 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-26 19:05 ` James Bottomley
2024-07-25 10:14 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2024-07-25 13:14 ` Greg KH
2024-06-20 16:59 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-06-20 23:18 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=813a6d1d-586b-467a-b4db-30d3b5e022cf@leemhuis.info \
--to=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox