* [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains
@ 2018-11-01 13:21 Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-01 17:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2018-11-01 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ksummit-discuss
Cc: Dmitry Safonov, Peter Zijlstra, Jeff Dike, Oleg Nesterov,
John Stultz, Andy Lutomirski, Cyrill Gorcunov, Christian Brauner,
Adrian Reber, Pavel Emelianov
Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently.
The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a larger
range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we have
other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various reasons,
e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters with
a completely screwed time base.
As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a technical
session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains
2018-11-01 13:21 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains Thomas Gleixner
@ 2018-11-01 17:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-01 17:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andy Lutomirski @ 2018-11-01 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: ksummit, Dmitry Safonov, Peter Zijlstra, Jeff Dike,
Oleg Nesterov, John Stultz, Andrew Lutomirski, Cyrill Gorcunov,
Christian Brauner, Adrian Reber, Pavel Emelyanov
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:21 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently.
>
> The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a larger
> range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we have
> other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various reasons,
> e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters with
> a completely screwed time base.
>
> As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a technical
> session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains.
>
I'm definitely interested, but I think there's only a 5% chance or so
that I actually end up at LPC.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains
2018-11-01 13:21 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-01 17:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
@ 2018-11-01 17:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-11-01 20:09 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-02 9:09 ` Pavel Emelianov
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2018-11-01 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: ksummit-discuss, Dmitry Safonov, Peter Zijlstra, Jeff Dike,
Oleg Nesterov, John Stultz, Andy Lutomirski, Cyrill Gorcunov,
Christian Brauner, Adrian Reber, Pavel Emelianov
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
> Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently.
>
> The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a larger
> range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we have
> other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various reasons,
> e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters with
> a completely screwed time base.
>
> As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a technical
> session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains.
I will definitely be there.
To whoever schedules these things can we please have this one of the
days that overlaps LPC. So that all of the CRIU and container folks
have a chance to show up. Ideally not during the CRIU or Container mini
summit.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains
2018-11-01 17:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
@ 2018-11-01 20:09 ` Christian Brauner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christian Brauner @ 2018-11-01 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ebiederm, Thomas Gleixner
Cc: ksummit-discuss, Dmitry Safonov, Peter Zijlstra, Jeff Dike,
Oleg Nesterov, John Stultz, Andy Lutomirski, Cyrill Gorcunov,
Christian Brauner, Adrian Reber, Pavel Emelianov
On November 1, 2018 8:42:24 PM GMT+03:00, ebiederm@xmission.com wrote:
>Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
>
>> Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently.
>>
>> The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a
>larger
>> range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we
>have
>> other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various
>reasons,
>> e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters
>with
>> a completely screwed time base.
>>
>> As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a
>technical
>> session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains.
>
>I will definitely be there.
>
>To whoever schedules these things can we please have this one of the
>days that overlaps LPC. So that all of the CRIU and container folks
>have a chance to show up. Ideally not during the CRIU or Container
>mini
>summit.
I can be there and I agree with Eric:
we should have LPC overlap without having containers/CRIU microconference overlap. :)
I have one more constraint. I have a talk at 2:30 pm for 15 min on the 14th too.
So if we could try to not do it at that time that would be great.
Sorry for that!
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains
2018-11-01 13:21 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-01 17:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-01 17:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
@ 2018-11-02 9:09 ` Pavel Emelianov
2018-11-03 17:13 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-11-12 14:06 ` Dmitry Safonov
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Emelianov @ 2018-11-02 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, ksummit-discuss
Cc: Dmitry Safonov, Peter Zijlstra, Jeff Dike, Oleg Nesterov,
John Stultz, Andy Lutomirski, Cyrill Gorcunov, Christian Brauner,
Adrian Reber
On 11/01/2018 04:21 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently.
>
> The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a larger
> range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we have
> other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various reasons,
> e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters with
> a completely screwed time base.
>
> As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a technical
> session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains.
I still plan to attend LPC, so I'll be there.
-- Pavel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains
2018-11-01 13:21 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains Thomas Gleixner
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-11-02 9:09 ` Pavel Emelianov
@ 2018-11-03 17:13 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-11-03 18:47 ` Andy Tucker
2018-11-12 14:06 ` Dmitry Safonov
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrei Vagin @ 2018-11-03 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: ksummit-discuss, Dmitry Safonov, Peter Zijlstra, Andy Tucker,
Jeff Dike, Oleg Nesterov, Victor Marmol, John Stultz,
Andy Lutomirski, Cyrill Gorcunov, Christian Brauner,
Adrian Reber, Pavel Emelianov
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently.
>
> The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a larger
> range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we have
> other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various reasons,
> e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters with
> a completely screwed time base.
>
> As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a technical
> session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains.
I'm interested and going to be there.
Cc: Andy and Victor
Thanks,
Andrei
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains
2018-11-03 17:13 ` Andrei Vagin
@ 2018-11-03 18:47 ` Andy Tucker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andy Tucker @ 2018-11-03 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: avagin
Cc: ksummit-discuss, dima, peterz, jdike, oleg, Victor Marmol,
john.stultz, luto, gorcunov, Adrian Reber, christian.brauner,
xemul
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 858 bytes --]
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:13 AM Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently.
> >
> > The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a
> larger
> > range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we have
> > other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various reasons,
> > e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters
> with
> > a completely screwed time base.
> >
> > As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a
> technical
> > session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains.
>
> I'm interested and going to be there.
>
> Cc: Andy and Victor
>
Thanks Andrei. I'm interested as well and will be at LPC for the full time.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains
2018-11-01 13:21 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains Thomas Gleixner
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2018-11-03 17:13 ` Andrei Vagin
@ 2018-11-12 14:06 ` Dmitry Safonov
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Safonov @ 2018-11-12 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, ksummit-discuss
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Jeff Dike, Oleg Nesterov, John Stultz,
Andy Lutomirski, Cyrill Gorcunov, Christian Brauner,
Adrian Reber, Pavel Emelianov
Hi Thomas, guys,
On 11/1/18 1:21 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently.
>
> The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a larger
> range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we have
> other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various reasons,
> e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters with
> a completely screwed time base.
>
> As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a technical
> session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains.
I've planned to be there, but it seems that my Canadian visa is not in
time.. (nevertheless I've applied in September for it).
So, please share your thoughts and concerns about the proposal with
Andrei. Beg your pardon for any inconvenience caused.
Thanks much,
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-12 14:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-01 13:21 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-01 17:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-01 17:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-11-01 20:09 ` Christian Brauner
2018-11-02 9:09 ` Pavel Emelianov
2018-11-03 17:13 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-11-03 18:47 ` Andy Tucker
2018-11-12 14:06 ` Dmitry Safonov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox