Re: KTODO automated TODO lists

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 02:44:15PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 02:31:11PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 03:29:18PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:55:56 -1000
> > > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 08:49, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Well here's a task: write a bot which follows the mailing lists and
> > > > > sends people nastygrams if one of their emails is more than 95%(?)
> > > > > quoted text.  
> > > > 
> > > > I think that might be better off as a spam filter rule.
> > > > 
> > > > Don't make it some after-the-fact "trawl the lists". Just make it a
> > > > bounce with a "you quoted too much". Same as the html avoidance.
> > > > 
> > > > Make it ok to quote 15 lines of commit message for a "Reviewed-by:"
> > > > kind of reply, but if it's more than 50 lines of quoting, trigger a
> > > > "at least equal parts new message".
> > > > 
> > > > I'm sure Konstantin has nothing better to do...
> > > > 
> > > >                 Linus
> > > 
> > > Paul,
> > > 
> > > Just in case you are wondering why one day one of your replies gets
> > > rejected ;-)
> > 
> > You never know.  Those who would have otherwise received my replies
> > might be very happy with this outcome.  ;-)
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> Hmm.
> 
> Thirty-two lines of quoted message.
> 
> Only two lines of response.
> 
> [Not including signature]
> 
> You are skating close to the edge of a 95% quote rule filter unless
> it counted the signature.
> 
> But
> this
> might
> also
> cause
> people
> to
> go
> to
> silly
> lengths
> to
> avoid
> having
> their
> message
> cancelled!

;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)
;-)

							Thanx, Paul