From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D65B67E2 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout.easymail.ca (mailout.easymail.ca [64.68.200.34]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0B6A466 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:27:23 +0000 (UTC) To: James Bottomley , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , clm@fb.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, Jonathan Corbet , olof@lxom.net, rostedt@goodmis.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Shuah Khan References: <1538670475.4003.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <82d32d94-1312-7d0d-6453-1749f5cec954@kernel.org> <1538861964.4088.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: <6d63890f-fa2f-6606-3400-e267f1bbc708@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:27:07 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1538861964.4088.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Review - Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 10/06/2018 03:39 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 12:10 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 10/04/2018 10:27 AM, James Bottomley wrote: >>> On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 08:24 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>> I have been trying to follow various threads on this topic and >>>> none of them address the review of this patch that went in. There >>>> is no mistake in the title of this topic. I do consider this >>>> topic to be more general than limited to Maintainer Summit. >>>> Hence, the choice of a wider Technical designation. >>>> >>>> So I am kicking off a thread to do the review with my comments. I >>>> am in general agreement with the spirit of this change to the >>>> existing "Code of Conflict". >>> >>> Just as an FYI, the Zephyr project recently included the >>> contributor covenant CoC minus the enforcement clause.  They did a >>> standard github PR for this: >>> >>> https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/10356 >>> >>> They note that they may add more enforcement details when the >>> community agrees on them. >>> >> >> Thanks for the link. It is almost identical to the Code of Conduct >> that went into Linux 4.19-rc4 minus the enforcement section. >> >> It would make sense to remove the enforcement section and discuss and >> add enforcement after the usual patch review process we already have >> in place. >> >> I personally would prefer amending the CoC in Linux 4.19 removing the >> enforcement details over waiting to discuss at the Maintainer and/or >> Kernel summit and releasing Linux 4.19 with the CoC v1 as it reads >> now. > > OK, I took this suggestion and posted it as a concrete patch set to see > how it flies. > Thanks for sending the patches. -- Shuah